Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Nokia |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Meteor grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a global score of 80.3, which is much better than vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 overall score. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's construction is a bit thinner than vivo X80 Pro, although it is just a bit heavier and was released around a year before. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Nokia 8 V 5G UW has 10 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, and although they both have a display of the same size, the vivo X80 Pro also has a greater display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px. The vivo X80 Pro counts with a little bit more memory for games and applications than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a much greater hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. The vivo X80 Pro features just a bit better battery life than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because it has a 4700mAh battery size. Vivo X80 Pro takes clearer photos and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a lot less megapixels back camera, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture to capture better low-light images and video and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.