Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Nokia |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is better than vivo X80 Pro, getting a general score of 80.8 against 72.6. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Nokia XR20 has 11 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version. Nokia XR20's construction is older, a lot heavier and thicker than vivo X80 Pro. The Nokia XR20 features a way better hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Nokia XR20, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, way more brightness, a greater pixel density and a bit bigger display. Nokia XR20 counts with just a bit bigger storage for apps and games than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The vivo X80 Pro features just a bit longer battery duration than Nokia XR20, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4630mAh. Vivo X80 Pro takes much better videos and photos than Nokia XR20, because it has a way bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures, a larger camera aperture, a much better video quality and a back camera with more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.