Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than vivo X80 Pro's score of 72.6. The nubia Red Magic 3S design has the same weight than vivo X80 Pro, but it is just a bit thicker. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but nubia Red Magic 3S has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 12 GB RAM. Vivo X80 Pro features a sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a greater screen density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a little bit larger display.
Vivo X80 Pro takes much clearer photographs and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video quality, the vivo X80 Pro also has a much larger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and videos, a bigger camera aperture, a more mega pixels back facing camera and higher video frame rates.
The nubia Red Magic 3S's storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is just as good as vivo X80 Pro's one, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit superior battery performance than vivo X80 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.