Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Sonic silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a global score of 76.2, which is a little bit better than vivo X80 Pro's score of 72.6. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the nubia Red Magic 5S has older 10 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version. Although nubia Red Magic 5S is a better cellphone than vivo X80 Pro, it must be told that it's also older, a little thicker and a bit heavier.
The vivo X80 Pro has a brighter screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, more pixels per inch of screen, way more brightness and a quite larger display. The vivo X80 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a much better performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Vivo X80 Pro has a little bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a way less mega-pixels back camera and a worse video definition, it also counts with a much bigger sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and a larger aperture for better low-light images.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with a bit longer battery duration than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.