Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 has a general score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than the vivo X80 Pro's score of 72.6. The Samsung Galaxy A22 construction is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than the vivo X80 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released only 11 months before. Both devices in this comparison review include the same Android 12 OS (Operating System), so they should provide the user very similar OS features.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy A22, because it has a bit bigger display, a much better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a way better display pixel density. Samsung Galaxy A22 counts with a lot better hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a little bit better storage for apps and games than Galaxy A22, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The vivo X80 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A22, because it has a bigger aperture, a back-facing camera with more MP and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
Vivo X80 Pro features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.