Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A30s has a general score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than vivo X80 Pro's general score of 72.6. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A30s has an older 11 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12. Even though Samsung Galaxy A30s is incredibly older than vivo X80 Pro, it's construction is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a way better screen than Galaxy A30s, because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a little larger display and a lot better pixels density. Galaxy A30s counts with a very superior hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A30s counts with a slightly better storage for applications and games than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB. The vivo X80 Pro shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A30s, because it has a much higher 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back, a bigger camera aperture for better low light photography and videos and a way higher video quality.
Vivo X80 Pro features greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has an 18% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.