Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is much better than vivo X80 Pro, having an 81.3 score against 72.6. Despite of the fact that Galaxy A31 is older than the vivo X80 Pro, it's design is lighter and a little bit thinner. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A31 has the previous 10 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy A31 has a lot better processing power than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X80 Pro has a better screen than Galaxy A31, because it has a greater count of pixels per inch in the display, a little bigger screen and a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
Vivo X80 Pro features a bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy A31, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A31 has a bit better battery performance than vivo X80 Pro, because it has a 6 percent bigger battery capacity. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A31, because it has a much bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture, a more mega-pixels camera in the back and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.