Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-04-10 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.69 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 437 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A40 has an overall score of 79.6, which is slightly better than vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 score. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy A40 is incredibly older than the vivo X80 Pro, it's construction is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy A40 has older 11 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a sharper screen than Galaxy A40, because it has a larger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a quite greater pixels count in each inch of screen. The vivo X80 Pro has a better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A40, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
Galaxy A40 counts with a much powerful processing unit than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X80 Pro has a much better battery performance than Galaxy A40, because it has a 4700mAh battery size. The vivo X80 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A40, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and video, a camera with a lot better resolution, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.