Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 has a general score of 81.7, which is better than the vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 general score. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A41 has an older 11 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version. Galaxy A41's construction is thinner and a lot lighter than vivo X80 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before.
The Galaxy A41 features a very superior CPU than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The vivo X80 Pro features a better display than Samsung Galaxy A41, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px, a quite larger display and a just a bit greater screen pixel density.
Vivo X80 Pro shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A41, because it has a larger camera aperture, a way larger sensor shooting much higher quality photographs, a lot higher video resolution and a back facing camera with a better 50 megapixels resolution. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A41, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The vivo X80 Pro has a superior battery life than Galaxy A41, because it has a 34% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.