Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A5 (2017) has an overall score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than vivo X80 Pro's global score of 72.6. Galaxy A5 (2017)'s construction is lighter and thinner than the vivo X80 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) features a very superior processing unit than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a really larger display, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a little bit higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display. The vivo X80 Pro shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a much better video quality, a larger aperture to capture better images in low-light situations and a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. Vivo X80 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 57% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.