Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is much better than vivo X80 Pro's score of 72.6. The Galaxy A50 construction is somewhat thinner and notably lighter than vivo X80 Pro, even though it was released 3 years before. Galaxy A50 counts with a really superior hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The vivo X80 Pro features a much better looking screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a better 1440 x 3200 resolution, a higher pixels quantity per inch of screen and a bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit bigger memory capacity for apps and games than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
The vivo X80 Pro features better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity. Vivo X80 Pro captures way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot more mega-pixels camera, a much bigger camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality and a larger camera aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.