Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is much better than vivo X80 Pro, getting a overall score of 86.6 against 72.6. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A50s is incredibly older than vivo X80 Pro, it's body is noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a much more powerful processing unit than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X80 Pro counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A50s, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200, a better pixel density and a little bigger screen.
Vivo X80 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50s, because it has a camera with a higher resolution, a much higher video resolution, a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture. Samsung Galaxy A50s has a little bit more storage to store more games and applications than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB.
Vivo X80 Pro has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has an 18 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.