Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is much better than the vivo X80 Pro's overall score of 72.6. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has an older 11 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12. The Samsung Galaxy A51 body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the vivo X80 Pro, although it was released 2 years before.
The vivo X80 Pro features a better screen than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, a greater pixel density and a bit bigger screen. The Galaxy A51 features a very superior processing unit than vivo X80 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a slightly bigger memory for games and applications than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB. Vivo X80 Pro features superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The vivo X80 Pro features a superior camera than Galaxy A51, because it has a back facing camera with more mega pixels, a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low light situations, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.