Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is way better than vivo X80 Pro, getting a overall score of 90.8 against 72.6. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's design is lighter and a little bit thinner than the vivo X80 Pro, although it was released 2 years before. These devices use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a much greater processing power than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X80 Pro has a much better looking screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, a little larger screen and more pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a quite bigger storage for games and applications than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The vivo X80 Pro features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a much bigger sensor shooting lot better quality photos, a back facing camera with more megapixels, a much higher video definition and a larger camera aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations.
The vivo X80 Pro features a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.