Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is way better than the vivo X80 Pro, having a general score of 90.7 against 72.6. Galaxy A52's design is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner than vivo X80 Pro, even though it was released about a year before. Galaxy A52 counts with a much powerful processor than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X80 Pro has a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a better 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution, more pixels per inch of screen and a quite larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a greater storage for games and applications than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
Vivo X80 Pro features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A52, because although it has a way lower 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light captures, a much better video definition and a way larger camera sensor which offers a lot higher photo and video quality.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A52, because it has a 4 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.