Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is a lot better than the vivo X80 Pro's global score of 72.6. These phones come with the same Android 12 OS (Operating System), so both of them should give the same operating system features. Galaxy A52 5G's design is a little thinner and somewhat lighter than vivo X80 Pro, even though it was released about a year before.
Galaxy A52 5G features an extremely better processor than vivo X80 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo X80 Pro counts with a sharper display than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a better pixel density, a higher 1440 x 3200 pixels resolution and a bit larger display.
Galaxy A52 5G features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB. The vivo X80 Pro takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a back facing camera with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor, a bigger aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited environments and a much higher video quality.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.