Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52s is a lot better than the vivo X80 Pro, with a 91.1 score against 72.6. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A52s has older 11 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version. Although Galaxy A52s and vivo X80 Pro were released with only 9 months difference, Galaxy A52s is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner.
Galaxy A52s has a lot better processing power than vivo X80 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy A52s, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px, more pixels per inch in the display and a little larger screen.
The vivo X80 Pro features a little bit better camera than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a camera in the back with a way lower 50 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light photos.
The Galaxy A52s features a greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Vivo X80 Pro counts with just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.