Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A6 has a score of 75.8, which is slightly better than the vivo X80 Pro's global score of 72.6. Although Galaxy A6 is notably older than vivo X80 Pro, it's construction is thinner and incredibly lighter. The Samsung Galaxy A6 features a much powerful processor than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The vivo X80 Pro has an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a larger display and a lot greater pixel number per inch in the screen. The vivo X80 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy A6, because it has a way more megapixels camera in the back, a way larger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and pictures, a way higher video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and videos.
Vivo X80 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The vivo X80 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 57% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.