Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2017) is a little bit better than vivo X80 Pro, getting a 75.8 score against 72.6. Although Galaxy A7 (2017) is incredibly older than vivo X80 Pro, it's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner. The vivo X80 Pro features a way better display than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a higher display density, a way better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a larger screen.
Galaxy A7 (2017) features a way better processing power than vivo X80 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X80 Pro has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The vivo X80 Pro features a greater camera than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a way higher resolution back facing camera, a lot better video resolution and a bigger camera aperture. Vivo X80 Pro features improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.