Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 has a score of 76.9, which is slightly better than vivo X80 Pro's global score of 72.6. Although the Galaxy A70 is noticeably older than the vivo X80 Pro, it's construction is thinner and somewhat lighter. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A70 has the older 10 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12.
Samsung Galaxy A70 features a much powerful processing unit than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X80 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A70, because it has a better pixels density, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a little larger display.
The vivo X80 Pro has a very superior camera than Galaxy A70, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a way larger back camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light captures. Galaxy A70 features a slightly bigger storage to store more apps and games than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB.
The vivo X80 Pro has just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy A70, because it has a 4% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.