Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 is much better than the vivo X80 Pro, getting a overall score of 87.5 against 72.6. The Samsung Galaxy A71 is an much older cellphone than vivo X80 Pro, but it's lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 has 11 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy A71 features a way better performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The vivo X80 Pro has a lot better looking display than Galaxy A71, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a bit bigger display and a higher pixel number per inch of display.
The Galaxy A71 has just a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. Vivo X80 Pro takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A71, because although it has a way lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos, a way bigger camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A71, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.