Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Prism bricks black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the vivo X80 Pro, having a 92.9 score against 72.6. Although Galaxy A71 5G UW is older than vivo X80 Pro, it's construction is lighter and a bit thinner. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12.
The vivo X80 Pro has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a higher quantity of pixels per display inch, a little bigger display and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bigger memory for games and applications than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a very superior processing power than vivo X80 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X80 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has a 4% larger battery capacity. The vivo X80 Pro shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a much less MP resolution back camera, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments and a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.