Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) is a little bit better than vivo X80 Pro, having a 79.2 score against 72.6. Although Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018) is noticeably older than vivo X80 Pro, it's construction is lighter and just a little bit thinner. Galaxy A8 (2018) features a much faster processing unit than vivo X80 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200, a just a bit greater display density and a bigger display. The vivo X80 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger aperture and a camera in the back with a way higher resolution.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X80 Pro has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 57% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.