Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A9 (2018) is better than vivo X80 Pro, getting a general score of 85.2 against 72.6. Galaxy A9 (2018) is an noticeably older phone than vivo X80 Pro, but it's lighter and thinner anyway. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a way better display than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a better pixels amount per inch of screen, a bit larger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
The Galaxy A9 (2018) has just a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A9 (2018) has a much powerful CPU than vivo X80 Pro, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity. The vivo X80 Pro features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much more megapixels back-facing camera, a way better video definition and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.