Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 is better than the vivo X80 Pro, getting a global score of 85.2 against 72.6. Both of these devices work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy F41 has older 11 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version. Galaxy F41's design is lighter and just a little thinner than vivo X80 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released just a bit more than a year before.
Galaxy F41 counts with a very superior processing power than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X80 Pro has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy F41, because it has a little bit bigger display, a greater pixels count in each screen inch, much more brightness and a better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with a better memory for apps and games than Galaxy F41, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The vivo X80 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a way less MP resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low-light situations and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has improved battery lifetime than vivo X80 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery size against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.