Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is a lot better than vivo X80 Pro, getting an 88.1 score against 72.6. Even though Samsung Galaxy F62 is a better cellphone than vivo X80 Pro, it must be noted that it is also an older, a bit heavier and a little bit thicker cellphone. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy F62 has 11 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy F62 counts with a much faster CPU than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and 6 GB less RAM. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has a little larger display, a lot brighter display, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
Vivo X80 Pro captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy F62, because although it has a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels, it also counts with a much bigger sensor, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger camera aperture. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a greater storage capacity for games and applications than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery duration than vivo X80 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.