Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than vivo X80 Pro's global score of 72.6. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy Fold's design is incredibly thinner than the vivo X80 Pro, although it's heavier and was released many years before.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much faster CPU than vivo X80 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Vivo X80 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and video, it also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera, a much higher video resolution and a much bigger sensor. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than vivo X80 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 7 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.