Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M20 is a little bit better than vivo X80 Pro, getting a general score of 78.9 against 72.6. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M20 has older 10 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy M20 is a lot older than the vivo X80 Pro, it's body is lighter and just a little bit thinner.
The Galaxy M20 counts with a very superior hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X80 Pro has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a greater pixels count in each display inch, a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a quite larger display.
Vivo X80 Pro takes a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy M20, because it has a lot higher video quality, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot more megapixels camera and a bigger camera aperture for better captures in low light situations. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy M20 features a bit better battery duration than vivo X80 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.