Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 84.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-03-23 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Midnight blue and Raven black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M21 has a global score of 84.1, which is much better than the vivo X80 Pro's general score of 72.6. These devices work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy M21 has the older 11 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12. Although Samsung Galaxy M21 is older than vivo X80 Pro, it's body is lighter and a little bit thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy M21 has a very superior CPU than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Vivo X80 Pro features a much better screen than Galaxy M21, because it has a little larger screen, a way brighter screen, a higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200px.
Vivo X80 Pro takes better videos and photos than Galaxy M21, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and video in low light environments, a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a much better video resolution and a more mega-pixels back camera.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M21, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy M21 counts with longer battery lifetime than vivo X80 Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery size instead of 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.