Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M40 is much better than vivo X80 Pro, with a overall score of 85 against 72.6. The Samsung Galaxy M40 is an older cellphone than the vivo X80 Pro, but it's noticeably lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M40 has an older 10 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy M40, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200, a better count of pixels per inch of screen and a quite bigger display. Samsung Galaxy M40 features a much more powerful processor than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Vivo X80 Pro shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy M40, because it has a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations, a much bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a lot more megapixels camera and a lot higher video definition.
Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The vivo X80 Pro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy M40, because it has a 34% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.