Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 516 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a global score of 87.7, which is a lot better than vivo X80 Pro's score of 72.6. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M51 has 10 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy M51 is an older and just a little thicker cellphone than vivo X80 Pro, but Samsung made it a bit lighter anyway.
The vivo X80 Pro has a much better looking display than Galaxy M51, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a quite larger screen and a greater pixels quantity in each screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a much more powerful processing unit than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Vivo X80 Pro features a superior camera than Galaxy M51, because although it has a way worse 50 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations and a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality photographs and videos.
Galaxy M51 has a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy M51 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than vivo X80 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.