Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the vivo X80 Pro, with a 90.8 score against 72.6. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is an older cellphone than the vivo X80 Pro, but it is just a little bit thinner and a little lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a much more powerful processor than vivo X80 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The vivo X80 Pro has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a bit larger screen, a higher pixel number per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. Vivo X80 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition, the vivo X80 Pro also has a way better 50 MP resolution back facing camera, a way bigger camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality, higher video frame rate and a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and video.
Vivo X80 Pro has a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The vivo X80 Pro has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 9% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.