Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the vivo X80 Pro, getting a 98.9 score against 72.6. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12, offering lots of additional features and increased performance. Even though Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is older than vivo X80 Pro, it's body is thinner and a bit lighter.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a lot better performance than vivo X80 Pro. They have the same number of cores and a 12 GB RAM. The vivo X80 Pro features a better display than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better screen density and a bit higher 1440 x 3200 resolution.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better storage for games and applications than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The vivo X80 Pro features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 4 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better camera than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, a tinier back camera sensor taking lower quality pictures and worse 24 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better 108 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.