Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is better than vivo X80 Pro, with a general score of 81.2 against 72.6. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has an older 5.0 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version. Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is an older cellphone than the vivo X80 Pro, but Samsung made it lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a very superior performance than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has less RAM and 4 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with an additional GPU. The vivo X80 Pro counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a larger screen, a lot better 1440 x 3200px resolution and a higher pixel count per inch of display.
Vivo X80 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a back-facing camera with a lot better 50 MP resolution, a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much larger camera aperture to take better photography in low-light environments.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. The vivo X80 Pro has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.