Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a score of 80.4, which is much better than vivo X80 Pro's global score of 72.6. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's construction is way lighter and somewhat thinner than vivo X80 Pro, although it was released many years before. The vivo X80 Pro features a better display than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a just a little better pixel density, a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a larger display.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a much better performing processing unit than vivo X80 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 47 percent greater battery size. The vivo X80 Pro captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a bigger camera aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light environments, a much higher video quality, a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a way higher image and video quality and a much higher 50 megapixels resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.