Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is a lot better than the vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 score. Samsung Galaxy Note10's design is thinner and incredibly lighter than the vivo X80 Pro, even though it was released 3 years before. The vivo X80 Pro features a sharper display than Galaxy Note10, because it has a better screen pixels density, a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution and a quite larger display.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a much faster CPU than vivo X80 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy Note10's storage to install applications and games is just as good as vivo X80 Pro's one, they have exactly the same internal memory capacity. The vivo X80 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 34 percent more battery size.
The vivo X80 Pro captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a lot higher video quality, a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.