Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is better than vivo X80 Pro, getting an 86.2 score against 72.6. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has an older 11 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is an extremely older device than the vivo X80 Pro, but it is a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter anyway.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a very superior performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has 6 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X80 Pro has a much better looking display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200 resolution, a little bigger display and a greater pixels count in each inch in the screen.
Galaxy Note10 Lite features a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds up to 1000 GB. The vivo X80 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Vivo X80 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger camera aperture, a much bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a back camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.