Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 has a general score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than the vivo X80 Pro's global score of 72.6. The Galaxy Note3 is an incredibly older cellphone than the vivo X80 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it just a little thinner and a lot lighter. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note3 has the newer 4.4.2 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version, so it gives you a lot of extra features and better performance.
The Galaxy Note3 has a lot better hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster). Vivo X80 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a bigger screen, a better screen pixels density and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3200.
Vivo X80 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy Note3, because it has a much bigger sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures, a much larger aperture, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much higher 50 MP resolution back facing camera. The vivo X80 Pro has a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
Vivo X80 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 47 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.