Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a score of 77.6, which is slightly better than the vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note4 is an incredibly older phone than vivo X80 Pro, but it's just a bit thinner and lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a much more powerful processor than vivo X80 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Vivo X80 Pro features a better looking screen than Galaxy Note4, because it has a just a bit higher pixel density, a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels and a bigger screen. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a back facing camera with a much better resolution, a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality photos, a lot bigger aperture and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.