Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 13.2 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note7 has a general score of 79.5, which is a bit better than vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 general score. Despite of the fact that Galaxy Note7 is much older than the vivo X80 Pro, it's design is thinner and lighter. Vivo X80 Pro features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3200, a just a little higher display density and a bigger display.
The vivo X80 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy Note7 has a much greater performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 34% greater battery capacity. Vivo X80 Pro captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy Note7, because it has a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.