Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-18 | 2017-09-15 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.94 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Deep Sea blue, Maple gold, Midnight black and Orchid gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 440.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note8 is much better than the vivo X80 Pro, having a overall score of 83 against 72.6. Even though Galaxy Note8 is much older than vivo X80 Pro, it's construction is just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner. These phones use Android OS, but the Galaxy Note8 has 9.0 Pie version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy Note8, because although it has a bit lower screen density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3200 and a bit bigger display. The vivo X80 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note8, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Note8 has a much greater hardware performance than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X80 Pro has a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note8, because it has a 42 percent larger battery capacity. Vivo X80 Pro captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy Note8, because it has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photos, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations, a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a lot better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.