Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is much better than vivo X80 Pro, getting a global score of 88.3 against 72.6. Samsung Galaxy S10 is an notably older device than vivo X80 Pro, but Samsung made it thinner and lighter anyway. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has 11 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy S10, because although it has a little lower amount of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. The Galaxy S10 features slightly more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a much powerful processing unit than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Vivo X80 Pro has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X80 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or videos in low light situations, it also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality photographs and videos, a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a way higher video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.