Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-05-18 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is much better than vivo X80 Pro, having a score of 93.6 against 72.6. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has older 11 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is notably older than vivo X80 Pro, it's construction is just a little lighter and somewhat thinner.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a much better processing power than vivo X80 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X80 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little bit higher amount of pixels in each screen inch and a little higher resolution of 1440 x 3200.
Vivo X80 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and/or video in low light situations, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
The vivo X80 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G feature extremely similar memory for games and applications, both have equal internal memory capacity. The vivo X80 Pro has a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has a 4% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.