Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 516 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is much better than vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 general score. Galaxy S10 Lite's design is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the vivo X80 Pro, although it was released many years before. The vivo X80 Pro has a sharper screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a better pixels number in each display inch, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a quite larger display.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much powerful processing unit than vivo X80 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Vivo X80 Pro features just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. Vivo X80 Pro captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a better 50 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a bigger camera aperture and a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot higher quality pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.