Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is a lot better than vivo X80 Pro's general score of 72.6. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has 13 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12, so it gives you a couple nice extra features and some performance improvements. The Samsung Galaxy S20 body is noticeably lighter and thinner than vivo X80 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
Vivo X80 Pro features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy S20, because although it has a just a little inferior pixel number per inch of display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1440 x 3200, the vivo X80 Pro also counts with a bit bigger display. Galaxy S20 features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a lot better performance than vivo X80 Pro. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount. Vivo X80 Pro captures way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the vivo X80 Pro also has a larger camera aperture, a much bigger sensor providing a way better image quality, a camera with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The vivo X80 Pro counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.