Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 FE is much better than vivo X80 Pro, having a score of 90.8 against 72.6. Both devices we are comparing here include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 FE has older 11 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12. The Galaxy S20 FE design is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than the vivo X80 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released just 20 months before.
The vivo X80 Pro has a brighter display than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels, a bit larger screen and a better pixel count in each display inch. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a much more powerful CPU than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo X80 Pro captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has a lot higher video quality, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
The vivo X80 Pro has just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S20 FE, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.