Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a score of 98, which is way better than the vivo X80 Pro's global score of 72.6. Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G's design is just a little thinner than vivo X80 Pro, although it is just a little bit heavier and was released many years before. Both devices we are comparing here use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version and vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version, providing the user a couple additional features and a performance increase.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a much better performance than vivo X80 Pro. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 12 GB RAM memory. The vivo X80 Pro has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1440 x 3200px resolution, the vivo X80 Pro also counts with a bit better display pixels density.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features more storage to install applications and games than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bit superior battery life than vivo X80 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots clearer photos and videos than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has slower video frame rates, a lot tinier sensor offering a way worse image quality and a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.