Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 98.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2021-01-29 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 8.04 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Phantom black and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 966.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has an overall score of 98.1, which is way better than the vivo X80 Pro's 72.6 score. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra's body is a bit thinner than vivo X80 Pro, although it's a little bit heavier and was released around a year before. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has the older 11 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra has a very superior processing power than vivo X80 Pro. They have a 12 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a bit sharper screen than vivo X80 Pro. Both have an equal resolution of 1440 x 3200, a higher amount of pixels per inch of screen, a screen with the same size and the same brightness.
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a little bit better camera than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for shooting photos and video in low light situations, lower 24 fps video frame rate and a smaller back-facing camera sensor which gives a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same 7680x4320 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra also counts with a way more MP back camera.
Vivo X80 Pro counts with a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S21 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra features just a little better battery duration than vivo X80 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.