Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 9.7 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is much better than the vivo X80 Pro, getting a 93.4 score against 72.6. The Galaxy S22 design is somewhat thinner and much lighter than the vivo X80 Pro, although both of them were released only 3 months apart. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S22 has the newer 13 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12 version, offering some extra features and better performance.
Galaxy S22 counts with a bit more vivid screen than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a way worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a quite smaller display, they both have the same display brightness. Vivo X80 Pro counts with a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S22 features a much better performing processor than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X80 Pro counts with longer battery performance than Galaxy S22, because it has a 27 percent larger battery capacity. The vivo X80 Pro features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S22, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera and the same video quality, the vivo X80 Pro also has faster video frame rate, a bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in low light situations and a larger camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.