Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.6 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2022-05-18 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.48 x 2.96 x 0.36 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Blue, Cosmic Black and Orange | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 50.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (60 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.2 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the vivo X80 Pro, having a score of 95.4 against 72.6. Although the Galaxy S22 Ultra and vivo X80 Pro were released only a couple of months apart, the Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is a little heavier but also a little thinner. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version while vivo X80 Pro has Android 12, providing you some additional features and better performance.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better looking screen than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1440 x 3088px and a little lower pixel count in each display inch, and they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also counts with a little more brightness.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better performing processing unit than vivo X80 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. Vivo X80 Pro features a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little bit better camera than vivo X80 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, a smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors and worse 24 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 108 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a little bit longer battery performance than vivo X80 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.